CAMPUS, as we use it in America, carries a sense of belonging to
something
old, honorable and beneficent. It is a far cry from the Roman field of
war, the Campus Martius. Yet in very recent American memory
campus was a combat zone, a smoldering place of confrontation.
In 175 years of history Miami University has had
many seasons of growth, progress and development, as well as a few
episodes of threat and crisis. The direst experience came in April
1970 when winds of change were lashing this nation and its institutions.
At that time an unprecedented turmoil brought disruption to hundreds of
campuses. A contagion of violence rocked foremost
universitiesÐBerkeley, Cornell, Harvard, ColumbiaÐas
well as remote colleges. Miami suffered less than many and survived
intact. But it was tried by flood and
fire.
In 1969 there were more than nine million fulltime students in
American universities, nearly twice the student population of 1960.
This was an angry and assertive generation, fedup with the Vietnam
War, with corruption in politics and injustice in race relations.
In many colleges students defied authority and derided
tradition. They disrupted scheduled speeches, invaded classrooms,
seized administrative offices, and halted normal operation. Their
spokesmen vowed to destroy the universities in order to build a
better world.
The Miami crisis came in a context of problems and upheaval. As
spring of 1970 spread its green miracle over the land, this nation
hovered on the edge of precipice. Nearly eight hundred universities
closed their doors, or prepared to close, while massed and marching
students cried for revolution. In Ohio three State-run
universities rumbled and erupted like volcanoesÐOhio University at
Athens in the southeastern region, Ohio State University in the
capitol city, and Kent State in the northeastern sect
or. The violence at Kent was less destructive than that at Athens and
Columbus, but it was most bitter and frightening. Ostensibly in
protest to the bombing of Cambodia, 12,000 miles away, three nights
of rioting resulted in the burning of Kent's ROTC building,
the trashing of downtown streets and the arrival of the Ohio
National Guard. The ensuing tragedyÐfour students killed and nine
others woundedÐdismayed the nation and startled the
world.
At Miami University the confrontation began in mid-April. For a
year student groups across the country had held monthly "Vietnam
Moratoriums" in protest of America's continued escalation of the
frustrating and sickening war. During the past winter Miami
participation in that protest had been curbed by severe weather,
examination periods, and vacation breaks. With pent-up purpose the
Miami Student Mobilization Committee planned a day-long
demonstration on Wednesday, 15 April. The plan embraced a
student "strike" for that day with "Free University" lectures replacing
morning classes, a People's Lunch at the campus hub just west of
Upham Hall, and an afternoon peace rally on the north lawn of the
Administration Building. The rally leaflet did not mention racial
concern although handbills circulated that morning called for
a student strike on April 20, in support of demands previously made
by the Black Students Association.
Moratorium Day passed quietly, with no general boycott of routine
classes, a mere 75 students (of the campus 14,000) gathering for
People's Lunch, and the afternoon rally peaking with a turnout of
five hundred. That affair began with a Philosophy professor's talk on
"Morality and the War," followed by a higher-pitched
speech by a black graduate student whose announced subject
"Racism and Vietnam" was belied by his focus on racism in Miami.
Finally the president of the Black Student Action Association stressed
the proposed April 20 strike and called on a coalition of
concerned whites to support five points on a handbill. These
points listed, he said," were requests when we started discussing them with
the Administration last January and now they are demands.
" The points included extension of the Educational Opportunity
Program to increase Miami's black enrollment, a plan of tutorial help
for additional black students, the creation of graduate assistantships
for black students, and the hiring of additional black faculty. At the close of the rally a black senior seized the
microphone and announced a march on the ROTC building (Rowan
Hall) in protest of militarism.
Rowan Hall, a small building of quiet dignity erected in 1949, was
named for a Miami man who became a Rear-Admiral in the U.S.
Navy. Stephen Clegg Rowan, born in Ireland in 1809 and brought to
America at age 10, came to Miami in 1825 when collegiate instruction began. After continued education at the Naval Academy he
served as midshipman on the first naval vessel to sail around the
world. During the Mexican War as executive officer of the sloop
Cayene he led a platoon of marines into San Diego;
in the Old Town Plaza they raised the first U.S. flag on soil that
became California. No one then could imagine an American war in
Indo-China. Rowan Hall, standing between the Miami
Sesquicentennial Chapel and the power plant, could not accommodate
the full ROTC unit. It contained offices and a simulated Destroyer
navigation bridge above a "main deck" housing a pair of anti-aircraft
guns and a single-barrel gunmount of the Destroyer class. The
installation was of limited use in naval officer training,
and it could not contain a mass student rally.
Student marchers on that April late afternoon found the brick
building closed and empty, but they broke in with racket that drew a
number of bystanders. Soon a hundred students surged in.
Laughing and jeering they swarmed around the naval emplacements.
A petty officer appeared, asking the intruders to stay on the main
"deck" away from the Corps command posts. About 5 p.m. a rock
combo pushed in. Quickly a party was under way--music and
laughter, clapping and dancing, and cheers for the arrival
of food and drink. There were no blacks among these early
occupants.
In recent weeks, after upheavals on other campuses, the Ohio State
government had outlined a contingency plan for crowd control.
Accordingly Vice President Etheridge shouldered into the room and
made his way up the stairs to the "bridge" level. There th
rough a bullhorn he read a statement that students breaking into
university buildings were trespassers, subject to arrest. That
announcement added zest to the demonstration. After a few minutes
Etheridge again raised his bullhorn. He stated that the st
udents, having made their anti-ROTC point, should now vacate this
U.S. Navy building. He added that they could regroup in Hall
Auditorium at the west end of the central campus, a more suitable
place for discussion and debate. While his words were hooted
down, a student leader, using his own amplifier, voiced three
demands: immediate canceling of academic credit for ROTC classes,
promise of abolishing ROTC from Miami University, and the granting
of Black Student Action Association terms.
In line with the state government's contingency plan the Miami
Security chief notified the Hamilton office of the State Highway
Patrol. On arrival at Rowan Hall four of those officers were greeted
with hoots, boos and jeers. Word went to Hamilton that more men
were needed. The Butler County officer notified Columbus,
and in the April dusk the Commander of the Ohio Highway Patrol,
with sirens blaring, arrived in Oxford to take charge. Meanwhile
student leaders vowed to sit-in night and day until their
demands were met. The most assertive of the agitators was a young
man no one seemed to know. When asked if he was enrolled at
Miami he said he was a former student who had been editor of the
underground news sheet Mandella. When Etheridge once
more read the state ruling, some of the students left. To those
remaining he stated "You are no longer students of Miami University,
but trespassers subject to state authority and arrest." When a
phalanx of some forty uniformed partolmen moved in, certai
n other students departed. The rest, about 160 in number, locked
arms in defiance.
By this time hundreds of students had gathered outside the building,
and troopers were showered with sticks, stones and debris. For
transport to the Oxford City Hall, apprehended students were pressed
into an old school bus, which broke down after a single trip. When
Hamilton was asked to send more men and
transportation, 160 police and sheriff's deputies responded. While
milling students immobilized their vehicles, the police sprayed mace
and tossed canisters of tear gas. Police dogs on half-leash scattered
crowds, which soon massed again.
Inside Rowan Hall voice horns repeated that all students remaining
there were liable to arrest. Highway patrol men, on standby in noisy
Spring Street, then moved in to clear the building. About 160 arrests
were made. Some proved to be non-students, former students and local
high school pupils. They were later called the "Miami 176," though
the number booked was 155. Over the midnight campus went rumors,
threats, alarms and fulminations. Roudebush Hall was locked tight
but a throng of students heard black and white spokesmen declare
that the classroom boycott previously set for April 20 should begin
that very morning, April 16. The strategy was to strike while the
iron was hot. Silence came to the littered campus at 2:30 a.m.,
while sheriff's deputies patroled the uptown streets.
Before daybreak Governor Rhodes telephoned from Columbus. He
was about to fly to Oxford while a convoy of trucks was bringing
National Guard troops to the Nike base just west of town. Arrived at
7 a.m. the governor conferred with President Shriver and held an
impromptu news conference. That morning fresh posters
called for immediate student strike and a noon rally on Roudebush
front lawn. At that gathering, under a lowering sky, speakers
denounced Governor Rhodes, cursed the police, chanted Strike!
Strike! Strike! and appealed for campus-wide support. Handbills
from the Black Students Association and a "concerned" white
coalition demanded: support of black action terms, reinstatement of
suspended students, and creation of a committee to investigate allactivities of the ROTC and determine whether it should
be abolished from the university. While the coalition offered to
dictate the makeup of this committee, thunder rolled and rumbled
overhead.
A gust of rain drove the crowd in to nearby Withrow Court, where
Student Senate leaders asked President Shriver to speak. Before he
could mount the platform a black leader seized the microphone. "The
president wants to say something. . . . Shall we let him
? . . . Okay let's let the dude speak." To a massed 4500 students
President Shriver declared that the university was already
committed to increase black enrollment and black faculty, that
though he opposed admission of unqualified students he had already
been approving trial admission of slightly sub-standard blacks who
did not apply for financial aid.He added that qualified black students
were assured of finacial grants and loans, and that
black assistantships could be provided in departments with certified
graduate programs. He refused, however, to waive suspension of
students who had refused to vacate the ROTC building; their way to
reinstatement was through due process. Proposal of an ROTC
evaluation had recently been rejected by both the Faculty Council
and the University Senate. This short direct presidential speech
was interrupted by boos, cheers, affirming shouts and heckling
questions, and repeated chants of Strike! Strike!
Strike!
When President Shriver left the hall a somewhat shrunken crowd
heard a black leader declare that the strike was now in force. Actual
attendance of scheduled classes was diminished by one-fourth. That
afternoon a gathering of faculty members, vexed that
they had not shared in official discussion of the student demands,
sent word to the president's office asking him to call special meetings
of the Faculty Council and the University Senate on Friday (the next
day), adding their intention to call their own
meeting of "concerned faculty" if he did not concur. Response from
the president's office was that the scheduled Faculty Council session
on Monday, April 20, would be sufficient. While gossip and rumor
gusted over the cloudy campus a steadying voice ca
me from the Political Science department. In a widely circulated
open letter Professor Reo Christenson emphasized that civil
disobedience entailed a responsibility to accept its own
consequences, and that demanding amnesty while denouncing
University paternalism was contradictory. "Faculty and student wrath,"
he concluded, "should be focused on two groups: those who needlessly
precipitated this wretched affair, and those police officers . . . who
seemed to relish the opportunity to exercise their power
in unbridled fashion."
The Student Senate issued a statement: "Justice requires that civil
law be restored, that all National Guardsmen, State Patrolmen and
Butler County Sheriff's Deputies be immediately withdrawn." It
concluded: "We do not condone the illegal occupation of st
ate property, but feel the temporary reinstatement of those students
involved is necessary until the legal procedure of due process can
take place."
On the following day, April 17, President Shriver announced that the
Highway Patrol had departed at noon, and the National Guard began
leaving the Nike base at 2 p.m. without having come onto the Miami
campus. Pronouncing the situation stabilized, he added t
hat while amnesty had not been granted, suspended students could
continue to live in their residence halls while due process was
observed. Trespass cases were heard in Butler County Court One, and
admission to classrooms would be subject to ruling by ind
ividual professors. The Students Senate created a special committee
on the Abuse of Rights (SCAR) to begin investigation, with legal
counsel, on the alleged violation of civil rights. Three uptown
fraternities formed their own coalition to achieve publi
c censure of law enforcement agencies "which indiscriminately used
dogs, tear gas and clubs, and overtly broke the law on the night of
April 15 and early 16." Under cloudy April sky the campus was still
teeming and steaming.
On April 18, Saturday, the usual weekend diversion was replaced by
heated debate and disputation. An unofficial meeting of "concerned
faculty" drew some 120 membersÐa bare oneÐsixth of the Senate roll--who
after three hours of talk went on record as "supp
orting the demands of the student coalition." They postponed for a
Sunday meeting the question of faculty participation in the student
strike, and the forming of a teachers' union. At the Sunday meetingÐ
another three-hour sessionÐabout one hundred members approved two motions:
to go, themselves, on strike in abetting the
student demands, and to resolve that no punitive measures be taken
against striking faculty. These were open meetings, attended by a
student audience a thousand on Saturday and some four
hundred on Sunday.
On Monday morning hearings began in the Oxford City building for
the Wednesday night trespassers in Rowan Hall. That evening over
the University's radio and TV channels and in an open meeting of the
Faculty Council President Shriver announced plans that
he hoped would resolve the strike: 1) proposal of a "pilot project" to
admit 100 students of no racial restriction who though academically
substandard would not seek financial waivers, 2) increasing
recruiting efforts for black students and faculty, 3) continued
encouragement of contributions to the Educational
Opportunity Program. While the Faculty Council adjourned a black
spokesman stood with clenched fist declaring "The strike is still
on."
The next day's attention was focused on the process of appeal for the
suspended students. To lighten their liability and soften their
penalty a "concerned" faction of Faculty Council moved to commit the
suspension appeal collectively to the entire University
Senate rather than to continue individual hearings. The effort
was defeated. Established procedure, with the Disciplinary Appeals
Board making judgments, was affirmed. Response to this action was
a wave of threats and fulmination. There was talk of a
"library run" removing hundreds of books on course reading
lists, of a telephone tie-up that would fill the university lines with
"busy" signals, of a power sabotage that would darken the whole
campus, of picketing food services and fuel deliveries.
These rumors emerged from a rally where strike leaders spoke of
"renewed efforts in non-violent ways." What followed was an act of
absurd madness. At 6 p.m. hurrying through 14 campus buildings
students lashed open water faucets in lavatories, shower rooms,
and laundromats. In twenty minutes more than two million
gallons were drained from Oxford's two water
towers. Floors
were flooded, sewers overflowed, water pressure vanished, and Oxford
was helpless if a fire broke out. City officials closed all t
he university mains until pressure could be restored. This was
vandalism to the point of sabotage. Damage exceeding $5,000 was
done to the town and college water systems.
On Wednesday the campus was strewn with handbills from the
"Student Faculty Coalition." Under heavy MORATORIUM headline
came: "A period of negotiation. Everyone should return to classes.
The moratorium does not mean the demands have been met. It
means a shift in tactics. The moratorium indicates on the behalf of the
strikers a willingness to negotiate. The moratorium will give the
strikers a chance to return to classes and encourage further
discussion of the issues. It doesn't mean you should lose f
aith or that the Coalition demands won't be met, but it does mean a
shift in tactics to increase the effectiveness of our sincerity." The
redundancy of this missive poorly masked a mingled frustration and
wit's end, a feeling of directly expressed by the
withdrawal of pickets outside classroom buildings.
That evening, in a fact-sheet called "What's Right," the University
Administration tried to replace gossip, rumors and distortions with a
plain statement. Yet another blitz of handbills signed "The Coalition"
stated that "the Coalition will not sanction
any continuation of the flush-in or such things as taking books from
the library to disrupt education, calling the administration building
for the purpose of disrupting communications, or shutting off the
electricity." It added: "This strike is against the
administration. Turning off water turns off
students."
On Thursday a new page appeared from a new sourceÐconcerned
"Miami Students." Condemning violence and disruption it pledged
"unqualified support to President Shriver in his efforts to handle this
critical situation," and urged all students to attend the Saturday
morning University Senate meeting. A statement from the Student
Senate deplored the flush-in and urged that it be "the last
thoughtless and disruptive activity at our university." The statement
was handed to President Shriver with 1036 signatures while
many leaflets were still in circulation. The Saturday morning Senate
meeting drew more than six hundred faculty members, a thousand
students, and various reporters from the outside press. A standing
ovation responded to President Shriver's pledge to increase
efforts in attracting black students and faculty. Declaring full
responsibility for his decisions in the past ten days and nights, he
adjourned the meeting with the suggestion that people talk with each
other "so that each may be heard."
&
nbsp;
During a few days of quiet the Faculty Council Disciplinary Appeals
Board continued hearings with men and women students. Some
stated opposition to the appeals procedure. Others offered reasons
for their actions on the Rowan Hall scene and asked to be reinstated.
To normal curricular routine was added a previously
scheduled Orientation for Black Students from Ohio high schools. No
one reported their impressions.
Age-old weather-lore tells of "the lull before the storm." The week of
May 4 began with shocking news and riveting scenes on television.
At noon on the sunwashed campus of Kent State University four
students were shot to death by the Ohio National Guard.
On the stunned Miami campus small groups of students talked with
professors in the hallways and with President Shriver between
telephone calls at Lewis Place and in his Roudebush office. The
tragedy at Kent was brewing violence across the state and nation.
Reports of turmoil on other campuses led Shriver to declare
Tuesday a "Day of Reflection" with classes replaced by informal
dialogue throughout the Miami community. He hoped that free and
general communication might lead toward "rational solutions
of our problems." He would speak in the open air next
morning.
At ten o'clock, May 5, a crowd of 4,000 gathered on the south campus
overlook, heard their president ask that concern over the Kent crisis
be kept low-key and orderly. (No one could have more concern than
Phillip Shriver himself; for eighteen years prior
to his Miami connection he had served Kent State from History
instructor to Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.) He hoped that
Miami students would talk together not as partisans but as fellow
citizens; he would be on campus throughout the day, ready
to talk and listen. Soon he was the center of 200 students seated
on the ground of the Hub quadrangle, where other groups were
gathered around various professors. After the lunch hour 3,000
students quietly formed a mile-long "Solidarity March" which
circled the campus and in growing numbers massed below the Sun
Dial Overlook. There two leaders of the Student Mobilization
Committee used bull horns to denounce the Rhodes-Nixon measures
in Ohio and Vietnam. The day of reflection was turning into a tim
e of turmoil.
In dusk and darkness a restive student traffic streamed up the Slant
Walk and dotted the uptown streets. At twenty-eight minutes past
midnight a fire-bomb shattered a ground-office window in
Roudebush Hall. Interior damage was limited by action of a sec
urity patrolman who chanced to be nearby.
On May 6, Wednesday, afternoon broadcasts reported Governor
Rhodes' proposal of immediate closure of any disorderly state
university. In Columbus Ohio State students were out of control,
looting and pillaging academic and commercial buildings and snarling
traffic in the streets. At 6 p.m. word came that Ohio State
University was closed. During the next three hours in Oxford voices
shrilled through town and campus: "Rally at the water tower!" From
that uptown center an inchoate march began, gathering numbers
and tension as it moved down the Slant Walk and through
mid-campus guards to the Sun Dial Overlook. President Shriver
joined six thousand students there. He proposed that the next days,
Thursday and Friday, be "Days of National Peace" devoted to dialogue
and rational discussion, classes to resume on Monday "with
determination to keep going until the end of the spring quarter." He
would return to the sun dial next morning at 10 o'clock for talk with
any and all who sought him. As the crowd dispersed
in the warm May midnight it seemed to many that Phillip Shriver
"once more had cooled off an explosive situation by this presence and
his willingness to listen."
The apparent cooling was deceptive. Between midnight and 1:30 a.m.
three fires were set. Security patrols extinguished a blaze in Kreger
hall on the campus hub and another in a storage hut on the south
campus. Students passing on the Slant Walk saw smoke
from a ground floor window of Hall Auditorium. With the help of
security men they checked the flames in a store room under the
wooden stage. This seemed the arson target, with the other fires
meant as diversion. Once aflame the wood and plaster auditorium
would burn like a barn. At daybreak of May 7 stacks of new
Strike posters were by chance discovered in an alley across the
street from Hall Auditorium. That morning the campus was strewn
with new handbills demanding a Friday strike to begin with a
rally at the Overlook, and urging a mass migration to
Columbus.
Soon after 10 o'clock that Thursday morning President Shriver faced
a crowd at the sun dial Overlook. He declared that as of that moment
Miami University and its branches at Hamilton and Middletown were
closed indefinitely. All students must be gone by
8 o'clock that evening.
At an afternoon press conference the president gave three reasons
for his decision: a prospect of uncontrolled turmoil, the safety of
students and security of buildings, and the recent recommendation of
the Ohio governor. He added that the faculty would
immediately make plans for completing the academic requirements
of the spring term. By president's ruling the executive Board of the
Student Senate could remain in Oxford during the shut-down to
assist in efforts to reopen the university. In its first ac
tion this Student Board released a constructive statement: "The
overwhelming majority of the Miami University student body are
convinced that violence is neither a legitimate nor an effective
method of settling differences." It concluded that students, fa
culty and administration were doing everything possible to
accomplish the early reopening of Miami University.
During ten days of closed campus the University Senate had a busy
agenda. For the harrowed spring quarter it made concessions on
course work and grading. Course content could be curtailed
proportionately to time lost in the closed period. Students would
be give the option of letter grade or of credit-no credit record in
any or all courses. For incomplete course work the instructor could
use S--meaning satisfactory progress. In the area of university
governance decision was made on the long pondered
question of student representation. The Faculty Council now voted
to add 12 student members to its roster of 24 faculty and
administration personnel. Many faculty felt, as did most of the
students, that this reform was overdue. To all Miami students
went letters from the president's office and a "Status Report" from
the Student Senate explaining plans for reopening the university. As
a precaution against fire or other destruction, a corps of faculty
marshals was organized for night time surveillance
of empty buildings.
On Sunday, May 17, the campus came to life with an influx of
students and the resuming of schedules. On Monday evening a
Forum for an Open University was held in Withrow Court. Its
sponsors, the Student Mobilization Committee, declared their desire
to keep Miami open as a base for their operation of protest and reform.
Amid continuous noise and confusion they elected a ten-members
steering committee to coordinate further activities. In that direction
they proposed an all-campus referendum on an immediate
reformÐthe replacing of scheduled classes by a curriculum of
informal courses "more relevant" than the classes scheduled. By the
time this "alternate university" was described the initial forum
turnout of 3,000 had shrunk to about 800. As this meeting
dispersed there were calls for a "Rally at the Water Tower." By
10:30 a thousand were milling on the red brick blocks of High
Street.
For some time President Shriver had been talking with students on
the front lawn of Lewis Place. Now he went uptown and offered to
talk at Lewis Place "all night if you want." Some few followed him
there. At midnight he returned uptown and persuaded a larger
group to leave with him. To free the traffic-clogged High Street
where angry and frustrated drivers imperiled the heedless crowd,
they clustered around a lamp post on the Slant Walk. Talk with
several hundred students and some sixty faculty members
began as discussion but turned into harrangue. Unless something
was done, here and now, to relieve tensions over course work and
grading, the university would be violently disrupted. Under that
threat President Shriver offered another option: in any class
students could choose credit or no-credit on work completed to
that point in order to concentrate on courses they considered more
desirable or more important. This decision at 1:30 a.m. concluded for
President Shriver five unbroken hours of confront
ation.
The next day was quiet but at evening streams of students again
usurped the uptown streets. About 9:30 a fire was reported in a
storage shed behind Fisher Hall. The sirens of a fire truck brought a
traffic jam at Town Hall corner. On its return the fire
engine was halted by students playing volley ball over the traffic
light and connecting cables. At 1:30 a.m. the streets emptied, but in
the City Hall lights burned on through a lengthy meeting of town and
gown officials.
Next day the president addressed a letter to all students telling them
of grave apprehension in the community. He asked them to avoid
crowding uptown and to refrain from seeming to challenge the
traditional concepts of lawful assembly. "Above all," he concluded,
"please do not let yourself get involved in questionable
actions instigated by someone else." At the same time a young
professor was distributing his own brisk memo: "Townspeople are up
very, very tight--getting very, very impatient. Ditto the police
chief. It will take, literally, one stone thrown through one
window to have the Sheriff called in. Let us isolate the few radicals
and trouble-makers. Let us not provide them with an audience. Do
not give them a chance to affect the lives of literally
thousands of people by closing down Miami."
From the municipal office the Oxford Council declared a 9 p.m.
curfew. Campus marshals, volunteers from the faculty, took their
stations. It was an eerie assignment, patroling dark hallways alert
for sounds of intrusion or a taint of smoke and flame. For
academic persons it was a duty unprecedented, almost incredible.
Posted in the Sesquicentennial Chapel, just thirty paces from Rowan
Hall, one saw again, in memory, the blinking lights and drifting gas,
the seizure, sit-in, drag-out, arrest and incarceration.
Turning away from the street the marshal saw moonlight
slanting through torn clouds above the empty overlook. Night
thoughts are natural to a campus: the upward reach of life, affirming
of truth and beauty, a feeling of Alma Mater, of being
possessed as well as of possessing. But these night hours were
long and the thoughts were fearful. Thoughts of a clenched divided
world, of torn and divided colleges in history's most favored nation.
On the northern wall inside the chapel doorway carved
words were dimly visible.
The night thoughts held more questions than answers. In this somber season
students had come to the hushed chapel alone and in groupsÐthe
young who looked in college for learning and understanding, for
capacities to shape a better world. But how could one protes
t a brutal warfare in jungles ten thousand miles away and the
despairing poverty of black citizens in America the Beautiful? The
angry student and the groping faculty marshal shared the same
dilemma.
On Friday, May 22, Oxford officials lifted the curfew. In good spirits
the six fraternities on North Tallawanda and Bishop street gave a
block-party, inviting the Oxford police and the Sheriff's deputies to
join them in celebration. At midnight the waning moon
looked down upon a town and campus at peace.
Traditionally a mellow memory book, the Miami Recensio for
1970 broke the mold. Entitled A YEAR OF CONTRAST AND CONFLICT
its double-page frontis photograph showed President Shriver facing a
defiant student with a microphone. The next page was a c
lot of black students with raised fists. Instead of idyllic campus
scenes its front section showed a protest march in Washington and
students massed on Oxford's High Street, the Window entrance under
a one-word banner STRIKE!, a group of disheveled students
astride the ROTC gun mount, washroom graffiti affirming ALL
POWER TO THE PEOPLE, a pair of half-clad students lying in the sun
beside a Cincinnati newspaper with black headline 176 ARRESTED AT
MIAMI. In the sorority section an upbeat page showed the
Delta Gamma chapter all in white middy blouses perched on the
stairs and bridge-deck of Rowan Hall.
The year of contrast and conflict ended with an unforgettable
Commencement. On the platform facing 2039 graduates and 10,000
audience was Colonel James McDivitt, husband of a Miami alumna
and veteran of two space flights; he gave commissions to 104 Air Force
and Navy ROTC cadets. Beside a gravely smiling president
Shriver sat the world-famous young American Neil Armstrong. In
his brief address the pioneer astronaut did not mention space
frontiers but spoke of frontiers in society where young people must
make constructive change. Then President Shriver called to the
platform the president of the graduating class, Paul Franks, a native
Australian who had become a citizen of Troy, Ohio. Saying that this
class had seen more change than any other class in
Miami's long history he urged the importance of tradition in a
changing society and challenged his classmates to regain and
revitalize the tradition of respect. As they listened in the vast
silence of the crowded hall his words touched their own scarred
memories and their inheritance of all the storm and stress of human
history.